> Comprehensive security and AI risk assessments that give you clarity on threats, vulnerabilities, and the strategic investments that actually matter—before incidents force your hand.
Every organisation carries risk. The difference between those who thrive and those who scramble lies in understanding which risks demand attention and when. Our risk assessment services cut through security theatre to deliver actionable intelligence. We don't produce shelf-ware reports filled with generic findings—we deliver prioritised roadmaps that align security investments with business objectives and regulatory obligations. Whether you're facing board-level scrutiny, preparing for certification, or integrating AI systems that introduce novel threat vectors, we provide the structured analysis you need to make confident decisions.
Traditional cyber threats, access controls, data protection, infrastructure vulnerabilities
// Foundation of organisational resilience—gaps here cascade into every business function
Model integrity, data poisoning, adversarial attacks, algorithmic bias, supply chain dependencies
// AI systems introduce risks that traditional frameworks weren't designed to detect or manage
Privacy Act 1988, SOCI Act 2018, industry-specific requirements, ISO/IEC 42001 readiness
// Non-compliance isn't just fines—it's operational disruption and reputational damage
We partner with organisations where security decisions carry real weight—and where generic advice falls short.
Companies experiencing rapid growth often inherit security debt alongside success. We help leadership teams understand where their risk profile has outpaced their controls—before customers, regulators, or attackers notice the gaps.
Whether you're integrating third-party AI tools or building proprietary models, you're navigating risks that most security consultants don't yet understand. We assess the full AI lifecycle—from training data integrity to production model security.
When compliance frameworks dictate your operating environment, risk assessments must speak the language of your regulators. We map findings directly to APRA CPS 234, SOCI requirements, and emerging AI governance standards.
Multi-stakeholder environments create unique governance challenges. We've built ISMS frameworks that work across institutional boundaries—balancing academic openness with appropriate security controls.
We offer flexible engagement models designed to match how you actually operate—not force you into our preferred workflow.
Our structured assessment methodology examines your environment against recognised frameworks (NIST CSF, ISO 27001, ISO/IEC 42001) while accounting for your specific operational context. You receive a prioritised findings report with clear remediation guidance and risk quantification your leadership can act on.
We become an extension of your security function—conducting quarterly risk reviews, monitoring emerging threats relevant to your industry, and providing on-demand guidance as your environment changes. Ideal for organisations without dedicated risk management resources or those in rapidly evolving sectors.
Traditional risk frameworks weren't designed for machine learning models, training data pipelines, or algorithmic decision-making. This specialised engagement addresses the unique risks AI introduces across three dimensions: Security For AI, Security From AI, and Security By AI.
> Rigorous process. Practical outcomes. No surprises.
Our methodology balances comprehensive coverage with operational efficiency—we understand you can't pause business operations for weeks of assessment activities.
Define boundaries, identify critical assets, understand business drivers, establish success criteria
Your involvement: 2-3 hour workshop with key stakeholders
Documentation review, technical configuration analysis, control testing, stakeholder interviews
Your involvement: Provide access to systems and documentation
Threat modelling, vulnerability correlation, control effectiveness evaluation, risk quantification
Your involvement: Validation sessions to confirm findings accuracy
Prioritised findings, executive summary, remediation guidance, implementation planning
Your involvement: Final presentation and Q&A
Clear prioritisation based on what actually matters to your organisation.
We don't use arbitrary severity labels. Every finding is rated against two dimensions that directly affect your decision-making.
| LIKELIHOOD / IMPACT | Negligible Impact | Minor Impact | Moderate Impact | Significant Impact | Severe Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almost Certain | Medium | Medium | High | Critical | Critical |
| Likely | Low | Medium | High | High | Critical |
| Possible | Low | Medium | Medium | High | High |
| Unlikely | Low | Low | Medium | Medium | High |
| Rare | Low | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Assessment without action is just expensive documentation. We ensure you can move from insight to implementation.
What You Receive
Not just a list of problems—a sequenced plan that accounts for dependencies, resource constraints, and quick wins. We identify which remediations unlock others and where parallel workstreams make sense.
Every recommendation includes realistic implementation effort (time, cost, expertise required) against expected risk reduction. This lets you make informed trade-offs and defend investment decisions to leadership.
Technical findings include specific remediation steps, configuration examples, and control implementation patterns. We don't leave you guessing how to fix what we've found.
For risks you choose to accept or defer, we provide clear documentation suitable for risk registers and audit evidence—including recommended compensating controls and review triggers.
Here's what working with us actually looks like—transparent timelines, clear deliverables, no scope creep.
We align on what matters most. Through stakeholder interviews and documentation review, we establish assessment boundaries, identify critical assets and processes, and agree on success criteria. This phase prevents wasted effort and ensures findings address your actual concerns.
The core assessment work. We review documentation, analyse technical configurations, interview key personnel, and test control effectiveness. We maintain regular communication throughout—no radio silence followed by surprise findings.
We synthesise findings into actionable intelligence. Risk ratings are calibrated to your context, remediation is prioritised for your constraints, and executive summaries are crafted for your specific audience (board, regulators, technical teams).
Assessment completion isn't goodbye. We provide clarification on findings, support your remediation planning, and conduct a follow-up review to validate progress. This ensures the assessment drives actual security improvement—not just a report on a shelf.
> Book a 30-minute consultation to discuss your security and AI risk concerns. We'll explore whether a formal assessment is the right next step—and if not, point you toward resources that might help. No sales pressure. No generic pitches. Just a straightforward conversation about your situation.
